Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Happy New Year
remember to remember your grievances and gripes,
your pitfalls and pains,
your sores and sorrows,
because there will be many more to come.
Before the clock passes 12,
realize where you are,
and where you came from,
because it is not you.
What you are,
what makes you is your smile,
your cheer, the twirl of your hair,
the gleam of joy in your eyes
when you see what makes you happy.
Resolve for nothing but what tickles you,
what pulls you, what drives you,
because there is nothing else that you need.
Sunday, December 29, 2013
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Things I want to do before I'm 30
2. Publish something.
3. Get another master's, maybe.
4. Climb something big.
5. Start a nonprofit.
6. Get my back fixed. And my left hip. And my knees. And my...
7. Get a black belt. I'm really close, but now I have to find a new dojo...
8. Take a trip anywhere without regard to timing or desire to travel there.
9. Live in a completely foreign place, like in East/South Asia.
10. Learn to swim, finally.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
No, Mr Prime Minister. No.
Unsurprising? Definitely. However, this is more than just the usual conservative nonsense; this takes the ire of the press and populace away from the spying infrastructure, with its flimsy arguments for 'national security' and incessant dissemblance, and onto an issue that nationalists and racists everywhere can agree on: that immigrants are bad.
No matter who they are, what their credentials might be, what their economic situation is, immigrants are bad. Except, you know, when the majority of immigrants to the UK are students.
Besides, stopping the flow of migrants to the UK won't precisely help the UK's economic situation, especially with Cameron's rhetoric about renegotiating the entire treaty. The UK has a large enough outflow of citizens and migrants as it is (check the statistics), and besides, if you want to solve a problem that originates from a distant (or not so distant) place, the problem must be solved at its origin, not at its periphery. If you want to stem the tide of immigrants from Romania or Bulgaria, then you encourage them to grow economically and develop a home structure that can support vast swaths of skilled and unskilled workers.
Cameron has always struck me as a man whose sight oversteps his reach. Perhaps he's pandering to the right-wing Tories in his party, or perhaps he's trying to convince himself that his protectionist and overtly illogical bunk is, well, not bunk; or, maybe he just wants to think that Britain is still in a partnership with America that somehow extends its empire and affords it to stand on its own in the international system.
Whatever the case, I hope that most Britons are keen to his style of equivocation and realize just how much of an obdurate, narrow-sighted man he has made himself to be.
That's all for now,
Das Flüg
P.S. I'm trying this social media sharing thing now. I have no idea how it works, but click one of the thingies and something might happen. There might be a free car in it for you, who knows...
Sunday, November 10, 2013
In response to someone asking me, "How was your weekend?"
How was yours?
Monday, November 4, 2013
The Taste of Green
Red is the burn of your skin after being out in the sun for too long, or the uncomfortable thump of your heart after leaning too far back on your chair and nearly falling over.
Orange is the taste of an orange (original, right?), or the tingle of the first autumn breeze.
Yellow is the taste of a banana, or the feeling of springtime sun on a cool day.
Green is bare feet in the grass in the summer, or shade on a summer's day.
Blue is cool water running over your feet on the shore.
Violet is the smell of flowers at first blossom, or the taste of blueberries.
Brown is cool dirt beneath your feet.
I'm guessing black is what most blind people would experience normally. Or maybe they're like Daredevil and have some odd sense of echolocation? Now that would be cool. Blind people, if you're reading this, please tell me. And maybe dress up in a red leather suit and fight crime.
Friday, October 18, 2013
The Earl
It's safe to say I like Earl Grey.
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Love: It's All You Need!*
For most of our adolescence, these phrases hold a bit of water: we're the center of our parents' attention (mostly), the country in which we live is the greatest because we live in it, that we are so smart and wonderful because we're unique, that those starving kids in Africa don't really exist because they're so far away, and so on and so forth. It's an easy and narrow life, and some people really do have it that easy and narrow because they have the means by which they can procure all those ephemeral promises.
But then we grow and realize that, in fact, the world is so far away from centering on us that we might as well be any one of the millions of trans-Neptunian objects orbiting the sun. We aren't unique and special and wonderful and smart; in fact, most of us fall right on the mean of intelligence. That's fine, really, because we all have our own specialties and abilities, except a few million other people have those abilities too, probably. It's just probability: with 7 billion people in the world, 1 million is less than 1% of the population, even though that number is unconscionably large to us. Those starving kids in Africa? They exist where you live, too, and maybe they once had a life just like yours.
As for your country being the best in the world, whether it's America or not? Well, sorry to say, but in most western nations (Russia and India included), fewer than 10% of people control around 90% of all wealth. The number of millionaires, for example, living in London have nearly doubled from 10 years ago due to the rise of the banking sector, while middle-class wages have decidedly shrunk, and the poorer have gotten, as one would expect, poorer.
This is life, but not what many would focus on in their daily lives. Most people only care for their hellish bumper-to-bumper commute, their meetings, their plans for Friday night, getting a date, getting laid, getting a drink, getting a raise, getting a promotion, getting a big house, getting a new phone, getting a new car, getting a job, getting a sense of existence by way of self-indulgence. That in itself is not necessarily a bad thing, regardless of how it connotes in society; having things is nice. A computer is infinitely preferable to a typewriter (regardless of what some think; a typewriter won't correct your spelling mistkae), a fuel-efficient, functioning car is better than a lemon, more money is more comfortable than less. Especially in America, more money affords more opportunities, especially when it comes to education.
In many ways, however, it is bad, though that sense of 'bad' comes when we value the things rather than people, or turn people into 'things' themselves. Valuing the objects over a person or superimposing an object into a person is, as one might expect, sociopathic in the sense of non-empathy on the part of the one objectifying the other. The most common use of 'objectify' is, as one might expect from a million and a half television shows spouting the phrase at us, used in terms of sexuality, i.e. one person seeing another person as a bin of emotional and physical output rather than as a human being whose emotional and physical status holds repercussions for the first person. That's not what I'm talking about, however.
This is more an appeal for empathy, even from those who view others as adversaries or competitors in this grand scheme of existence. Nothing in this life is granted by birth except for the certainty of death. That is tautological to a point, but it then derives to a more basic question: how will one spend one's limited time?
Thinking that we're special and unique and that we can do anything if we just try is hokum. Think of the business and political world: it's not what you know that matters, but who you know. You can have achievements streaming out of your ears, but if someone has a better connection than you do for employment, there is a good chance that your achievements will continue streaming out your ears as you pound your head against a wall for not getting your desired position.
Why? Because connections will always be more important than strangers. It's difficult to tell a friend that you chose a stranger for a job over them because it almost seems like a breach of friendship, even if the stranger is strongly qualified.
At the same time, the stranger is strongly qualified. It isn't a personal statement about your dearth of abilities, it's a testament that you were even considered for such a position. Take it in stride and walk on, because the other person worked just as hard for that position, if not harder. Losing with grace is more important than winning, even if you think you are a special snowflake in the vast sea of a blizzard.
So, consider others. One of the most common platitudes is "put yourself in their shoes." It's good advice for all, considering that we all think we're unique and wonderful and living in the best country in the world. Maybe we don't know why some people overseas act the way they do, and so we think it's because they hate our way of life. Or, put yourself in their place, and think of how they see the world. Or, more simply, because we're all special and wonderful and living in our own minds sometimes, we neglect to consider how everyone else would act when we do. Taking yourself out of the center and gaining perspective is perhaps the best method by which we can understand why things happen.
So while there may be one million or so people like you, you still have the ability to be unique and wonderful and special just by caring. Go out and care. Go. Your life might just be improved for it.
That's all for now,
Das Flüg
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Bit of an Oddity
In addition, food is extraordinarily more expensive in the US, at least where I've been doing my shopping: Stop & Shop. A tin of nuts at Stop & Shop goes for somewhere around $5, whereas the same amount of nuts at my local Tesco in London would have gone for anywhere from £0.80 to £2 (around $1.50 to $3.50). I've noticed this with just about every other food I've bought in Stop & Shop: Tesco wins out, even with the exchange rate.
I make it a habit to avoid the most common sweetener in just about every food in America, high fructose corn syrup, but even so, the strangely sweet taste is still there. It's disturbing, because it is a repulsive taste in bread, and I'm actually surprised that I was able to eat bread in America for so long without noticing the taste.
Is it psychosomatic? I admit that is a possibility, but at the same time, I still find the supposedly "fresh" vegetables I buy at S&S to be disgusting.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
An Open Letter to David Cameron
Mr. Prime Minister,
I'm not going to address your subservience to US policy, as I would typically do. I'm not going to talk about the iniquitous decisions you've made regarding the public services in the UK. I'm not even going to mention your party's eschewing of the EU regardless of the benefits it confers to the UK. Instead, this is personal.
I'm an Anglophile. From a young age, I fed myself a steady diet of British culture, starting with Harry Potter and continuing with Monty Python to the works of Charles Dickens and the daily morning cup of Earl Grey. That wasn't the simplest thing to do, as my father is an immigrant of Argentina (and was once deported from the UK years ago, or so he says), but I was luckily a self-sufficient kid in the ways of the Internet. I imbibed it like the holy grail it was to me.
Understandably, I wanted to go to a university in the UK. I was accepted to several, though I ultimately ended up at the London School of Economics, an extremely prestigious institution, as you know. I was overjoyed, I can tell you that. I had high hopes of obtaining a job, work visa sponsorship, and in good time, UK/EU dual citizenship with the US. Hell, I've even mapped out my dream retirement options: getting a cottage in Cornwall where I could grow vegetables in the garden, or opening a small, friendly pub in London called the Drunken Ass (with a donkey on the sign) where I could serve patrons a tall one without the annoying music or overbearing noise of a match. It would just be a place for friends to congregate and enjoy each other's time, except on karaoke Thursdays. That's a special day.
What's wrong with that dream? Like any other cherished photograph, it has chipped away with experience. I had several interviews in London, very good ones, I might add, but when the conversation turned to my work availability and visa issues, a dark, foreboding silence befell the room each time before I was told that my prospective employers don't do visas.
Here I am, back in the desolate suburbia of New Jersey where I passed through my adolescence in relative ennui, and all I can think about is being back in London. It's unfair to allow someone to become so enamored with a city and then tell them that, because they aren't a native, they haven't a chance of staying there. I'm not unique in this respect: other Americans from my Master's program are trying to stay and are riding out the extent of their visas (until January), after which point they'd have no choice but to return to the United States. I had the misfortune of having to move out of my flat, and since I had no job, there was no point in paying for an ephemeral hope of a job that would sponsor my visa.
I believe that the old visa rules, since you so dutifully decided that immigrants were "bad," dictated that students who obtained a degree with a UK university could stay for two years past their graduation. Now, it's six months, which is a troublesome time limit because renting a room or a flat for six months is harder than one might think.
All we want to do is work to improve both our own lives and the lives of those around us. We want to pay taxes, support the social system that you are so ardently privatising, and enjoy the cultural gravitas of England. Instead, you and your xenophobic lot are making it harder for even EU immigrants to come to the UK.
You're not an empire. You're an island that is part of a greater federal entity that is the EU. Give up the illusions of your past delinquencies and accept that you no longer have influence without the EU. What's more, without an influx of skilled migrants, you only hurt your own economy. If someone with an advanced degree wishes to work within the UK, why shouldn't they have the chance to do so? To keep jobs "British?" What of those who want to become British? Should they not have the same chance to do so?
Mr. Cameron, you're not unreasonable. Your surprising adherence to the Syria vote in Parliament shows that. I only wish that you'd realise that the UK is no longer in a position to exclude people who want to become a part of your society. We are skilled and we want to bring our abilities to you, whether we're doctors, or lawyers, or entrepreneurs, or engineers, or political strategists, or the like.
Don't punish us simply because we're not native-born in the UK or the EU. Borders now mean very little. If a migrant such as myself, who paid my £750 a month in rent (not including utilities, mind you) and my £17,000 in student fees, wishes to stay and live in the UK, what reason is there for not allowing me to do so?
I'll pay the bloody Council tax. I'll gladly pay into every single social service that deducts from my paycheck through taxes because those social services are integral to the functioning of the state. I'll work a terrible entry-level job that hardly pays above the visa minimum salary. I only ask that you give us, the lot of us who want to stay, the chance to do it. We aren't a drain on your society, like so many conservatives would say; that's anodyne and illogical. Why would we drain something we so desire?
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Electoral Monkey Business
Anyway, I started thinking about how campaign contributions have become such a hot issue, which is why they should be removed entirely. Yes, that's right, no more Super PACs or 501s or any tax-deductible contributions to politicians. Here are my thoughts in gist:
- Remove campaign contributions entirely. Instead, a candidate with a net worth higher than x (say, $1 million) funds his own campaign in addition to a set budget from the federal government that is inversely proportional to his/her net worth. So, for a candidate who has a lower net worth, they would receive more federal funding for campaigns.
- Proportional representation rather than winner-take-all in each state. Simple enough.
- Stipulations for re-election:
- had to sponsor a certain amount of legislation in D.C. with a certain percentage passed. Obviously can be used to oust members whom some may not like, but a minor point.
- had to demonstrate bi-partisanship (needs specifics, obviously)
- had to show a willingness to compromise with other (probably too much to ask, but might as well mention)
- Can't be ignorant of simple science, especially if they sit on a scientific committee
- Pecuniary penalty for citizens who don't vote. Nothing too steep (probably less than $100), but enough to encourage people to vote.
- After losing a house/senate seat, a former congressman cannot become lobbyists for 5 years. Hell, 10 years. Go be a teacher or some other productive member of society.
- Remove federal restrictions on third party funding. (Needing 5% of the electoral vote to qualify for funding)
- Ban on campaign commercials.
That's all for now,
Das Flüg
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
A Trekkie's Review of Star Trek Into Darkness
What's more, I hate that I have to justify hating it, just because it fails on so many film-making levels that I'm surprised it's not more hated. Anyway, short list of things I liked (SPOILERS FOR THE FILM):
- Simon Pegg as Scotty and Karl Urban as Bones. The two big Trek fans know their characters, and it shows.
- CGI ships look cool.
- Benedict Cumberbatch can deliver any line with bravado.
Kirk gets demoted because of his interference with an archaic culture and loses the Enterprise to lovable Admiral Pike. Pike gives him his character's theme for the entire movie in a speech, at which point I smacked myself in the forehead. Pike then got killed right after he had a nice father-son moment with Kirk. Cliche? Yes. That's two smacks on the forehead.
Kirk and company get sent to Qo'nos, home of the Klingons, by menacing Admiral Batmanvoice, where one Benedict Cumberwhatsit somehow teleported himself from Earth after killing a bunch of high ranking people. Instantaneous transportation across more than a dozen lightyears in more than a second? Who the crap needs ships? Just teleport- oh, right, plot device.
The Enterprise sits at the edge of Klingon space and somehow sends a message only to Cucumbersandwich that they'll launch torpedoes at him if he doesn't surrender. First, how do the Klingons not hear the transmission? Second, how do the Klingons not notice the Enterprise sitting so close to their homeworld? That's kind of, I don't know, aggressive? Maybe they were all out hunting targ or waiting eagerly for Worf's birth.
Admiral Baritone arrives in a giant ship after the Enterprise tells Starfleet that they've captured Crumblebumble, who reveals that he's the infamous Khan, except no one on board ever heard of him. Plot twist revealed: Admiral Smoothvoice put Khan's genetically-enhanced friends in those torpedoes, and when they were to land on Qo'nos, they would awaken and incite a war between the Federation and the Klingons. Why? Because "war is inevitable," says Admiral OldManSexyVoice.
But wait, that's not all: Admiral TonytheTiger found Khan in cryo-freeze on the derelict ship Botany Bay and unfroze him to help said Admiral build a new arsenal of weapons. Keep in mind that Khan was frozen for 300 years, so if the Admiral wanted to learn about bullets and maybe some nice compound bows, it would be most edifying.
Fuck it, I'm skipping ahead.
Admiral BoomBoom shoots the hell out of the Enterprise, which somehow doesn't explode even though there are large, gaping holes in what looks like engineering. Fine, containment fields, or whatever, but don't then tell me five minutes later that shields are down to 6%. WHAT SHIELDS? The first damned shot on the Enterprise made a section explode in a giant space fireball. There were no shields, J.J. Abrams. There were no shields.
They end up next to the moon, and somehow, the lunar colonies don't notice anything. Somehow, there are no other ships near Earth. Somehow, there are no space stations with sensors to see "hmm, what are those two ships doing there? Is that the Enterprise about the blow up?" Later on, the two ships start falling to Earth instead of the giant body next to the two ships, i.e. the giant white orb we on Earth see at night. Someone needs to learn about gravity.
And then there's the giant rip-off of Wrath of Khan, not to mention a deus ex machina ending so contrived that it gave me a concussion. I won't even bother mentioning it.
The whole film is character-driven, but really, they all have nothing to offer aside from Crumbcake's Khan, who is basically a stale, one-sided bad guy that, while he does have nice character moments, is underutilized and monotone.
I don't know who vets these scripts for internal logic and consistency, but dear god, hire some interns to put a red pen to every stupid plot device. Please.
And dear god, J.J. Abrams, stop with the lens flares. You're liable to induce a seizure with those damn things.
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Big 'ol Narrative
To finish it, however, that's a bit too much of a leap. When I'm done, I'm done with London. The companies I interviewed with weren't willing to sponsor me for a work visa. It's a bit ludicrous, this new conservative position on immigration that David Cameron has espoused. Reducing the amount of qualified immigrants (I think I fit under that term) is only detrimental to the country. Besides increasing genetic diversity (a funny point to make, but a valid one), larger influxes of qualified immigrants can help grow business sectors due to better qualifications and international experience (language, international business, etc.).
Besides that, I just want to live here. It's a nice country, never too hot nor too cold, the people are pleasant, etc. I've had a few interviews where I could have gotten the position except for the one looming elephant in the room: a work visa. It's not as if I'll be working illegally and not paying taxes: hell, I welcome taxes. It helps fund the NHS, social services, police, fire brigade, etc. So why shouldn't I get the chance to live and work here?
This is always one of the reasons why I can hardly ever get behind any conservative position, whether it's in the US or the UK: it's jingoistic. It's overly nationalistic to the point of narcissistic nihilism. Let the rest of the world be damned, we are the best! Let us pound our chests until we cave in our bones just to show how dedicated we are to our countries and our "own!"
The UK is part of the European Union. Without European Union membership, the UK would be worse off economically. Hell, the US depends on the EU so much that if the EU were to completely embargo the US, the world would shut down. Nationalism falls when you realize just how much you need the "others" in order to survive.
A fine flow of qualified immigrants is not a detriment in any sense of the notion. For those ardent Milton Friedman followers, allowing immigrants to live and work within a country should increase the competition of the native workforce and, if it stands to reason, the native workforce should increase its own quality to keep up.
I just wish we didn't let borders determine who is "us" and who is "them." It's a piss-poor way of defining a person.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
All of this because he exposed wrongdoing by the US military.
The law, in the case of the military actions, is not subjective. The US cannot escape culpability simply by deeming the incident "classified" or "off-the-record" or by labeling those innocents killed as "terrorists."
This is a poor, poor precedent.
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Boy Meets Anachronistic World
Bond is a relic of the Cold War. The USSR fell, deflating the military tensions between Russia and the west, and ushering in a time of what some may call "Big Power Peace," simply meaning that there are no wars between the large powers. So, if there is this peace, then why do they still need to spy on each other?
As just about the entire world knows, Edward Snowden, former NSA analyst, leaked information that the US had a massive spying program. That, in and of itself, is not surprising. The kicker, however, was their largest target: Germany.
I was gobsmacked, to use local British parlance. Germany, of all countries, was the target of more spying than Iran, or China, or North Korea, or any of the US' so-called "enemies." Why? Well, there hasn't been any real clear answer, but I can dare to speculate: the US wants to know what will happen with the Euro. Whatever the intention of the US is to do with that knowledge, whether it is used for undermining or attempting to corner the currency swap market, only those in the US intelligence community can know. Again, it's speculation, but I can't fathom any other reason as to why the US would spy on a reputable ally.
Then we come to the very notion of spying on allies, something presumably thought of as unconscionable and unethical. It is a notion stuck in the 1950s, held back by myopic thinking and government bureaucrats still old enough to remember when they were appointed under the Nixon administration. These soulless minions of orthodoxy take a singular form: the aged, commonplace, almost ubiquitous elite in the Pentagon, the State Department, Congress, and the White House. Do they still hold the notion of US hegemony over everyone to be the end-all, be-all?
These men and women (though there are exceptions) grew up in an extremely simple time in terms of foreign policy: good and bad, Capitalism and Communism, us and them, etc., whatever it was the propaganda dictated. Can we truly expect these people to understand a new multipolar world where the machine is greater than the sum of its parts? In other words, can these people see anything aside from power politics where the US is king and premiere?
Possibly not, possibly so: there is evidence for both. On the one hand, the US still has the most technologically advanced military along with the most expensive professional army in the world, and yet they were stymied by guerrilla fighters using weapons from WWII. Clearly, it is not the size of the army or the strength it holds that truly matters anymore, but its ability to adapt to the changing character of war that truly displays its might.
On the other hand, there are senators, such as Elizabeth Warren, who have demonstrated a keen understanding of new age domestic politics, especially in her dogged pursuit of those who perpetrated the financial collapse of 2007, along with her support for aid to university students, where tuition is liable to bankrupt the average student. But, and this is the unfortunate reality of it all, she is the minority.
The men and women now in government had it easy, at least comparatively: tuition prices were exponentially lower when they attended university, and getting some kind of job right out of college was more common than not. The government scandals coming from these neo-Reaganist administrations is enough to sour politics for the younger class, especially those who find their ideals placed in someone who, like Janus, shows one face to the public but a wholly different one when it comes to governing.
So what can we expect of those youth who still want to enter government? Do they work under those who perpetuate orthodoxy, who still believe in Cold War machinations of politics? Do they adopt those beliefs and erase whatever preconceived ideals they might have had, just because they do what is expected of them rather than what is better? The answer is that, well, I don't know. My generation never knew the Cold War, and we have yet to truly enter government and make a difference. We would have to literally let the old guard die to completely understand whether or not we can think outside the realm of defunct notions.
And so, like a boat tethered to shore, we wait for the ideal opportunity to remove ourselves from those anachronistic beliefs of the past and pave our own paths in politics and diplomacy, because otherwise, we will rust and fall apart.
That's all for now,
Das Flüg
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Imminence
He paused for a second, looking somewhere beyond the small green light of the webcam.
"If they didn't make it, well, just know that we existed. I suppose, I suppose that's enough."
With that, he ended the video and saved it to the flash drive. The few clicks of the computer's mousepad echoed through the empty flat much too loudly for the maintenance of sanity. He ignored the daunting emptiness of the world around him as he placed the flash drive into the heavy iron ball on the floor next to the computer and snapped the latch shut. The world was quiet once again, save for the gentle tremble of the ground.
He stood up from the couch, brushing away the ashes of all the history he tried to recall, grabbed his coat and cricket bat, and left the flat. False footsteps of others echoed around him as he made his way down the building and out the door.
"Right," he said, turning his head.
"Left," he said, looking the other way. The sounds of the Thames and gentle hum of the wind were the only other indicators of sound on the deserted cobblestone street. With a sigh, he trotted down the street.
The cricket bat clunked off the ground several times, testing the air for any muggers or raiders or signs of life. Nothing. He entered Covent Garden, tapping the cricket bat against the cobblestones just loud enough for the world to hear. Nothing came running to or for him during his casual saunter through the abandoned and derelict marketplace.
For a moment, he stopped and looked up, trying to peer through the darkened cloud cover to see something spectacular. Unfortunately, the London weather hadn't left with most of its population.
He walked, unfazed by the nagging screams and shouts of fear between his ears caused by the gentle tremors, until he reached his destination. It was the only place whose lights were actually on, shaking with the gentle wobble of the ground. He entered and the bell above the door greeted him with false familiarity.
"Whaddya want!" screamed the balding man behind the bar. Only the top of his head and his eyes were visible above the counter.
"A drink," said the man. He took a stool and leaned the cricket bat against the counter. The barman glared at this stranger, his eyes becoming miniscule with his squint.
"Whaddya want?" asked the barman, still hidden behind the bar. The man rubbed his cheek. The bristles of his facial hair lent some white noise to the air.
"Don't know, never been much of a drinker. Something strong. I don't need my brain cells anymore."
The barman stood up straight and rubbed his stubby jaw.
"Whiskey?"
"Sure."
He grabbed a glass and a bottle of brown liquid from behind him. Before pouring, his large brown eyes glanced up to the man.
"On the rocks?"
"I have no goddamned clue what that means."
"Ice?"
The man shrugged. The barman poured the drink, stopped for a moment, and pulled out another glass. He poured himself one as well and raised it up.
"To the end of all," he said, his hairy-knuckled hand shaking with a modicum of sadness. The man raised his glass as well.
"To better business," said the man, looking around at the empty stools, chairs, tables, and couch.
"Amen to that."
They both downed their drinks, though the man immediately scrunched up his face. The barman chuckled.
"You're right, you're not much of a drinker."
"Never was," said the man, shaking his head and wiping his mouth.
"Before this mess, I was a vegetarian too. And pretty healthy. Didn't eat candy, or ice cream, or damned near anything with processed sugar."
"Tha' right?"
The man nodded and took another sip.
"Pretty much as soon as it was announced, I gave it up. Well, I was in denial for a bit like everyone else, kind of hoped it was a sick joke or a miscalculation or something, but after a week, I said, 'fuck it,' and gave in."
"Mm. American?"
The man nodded.
"I was a student."
"And you didn't drink?" the barman asked. The man shook his head, and the barman laughed.
"You Americans, always fockin' crazy."
The man ran his hand along the cool, sleek wood of the counter. A bit of dust accrued on his fingers.
"So how come you're still here?" asked the man. The barman downed his drink and poured himself another.
"Well, not much of the church-goin' type meself. B'sides, I've run this pub since I can remember. It's better than my fockin' wife, throwing her caution to the wind and runnin' off with some bloke who came in here every night. Plus, not really of the cultist, 'pray to the oncoming planet and hope for the best' type. This pub is all I have, and I've got some decent drink here. Not going to let this go to waste before we're all blown to high hell."
The man chuckled and looked around the pub. Its softly lit, wooden brown interior led him to believe that, in its prime, this had been the comfortable house of forgotten sorrows for many, and had likely seen and heard much more in its time as a silent listener than anyone still on Earth.
"We're not getting blown up, actually."
"Whaddya mean?" asked the barman in a somewhat upset tone.
"The oncoming planet won't cause Earth to blow up like the Death Star or something like that. First, we've got the earthquakes. They're light now, but they'll get heavier and heavier. Along with the earthquakes will be the unstable tides. I'm willing to bet that the Thames will flood more often than not in the final week. That's just the effect from the gravity of the other planet at a distance somewhere between our moon and the orbit of Mars. Then, assuming that the other planet doesn't collide with the moon, and I don't believe it will, as the planets move even closer together, think between the moon and the Earth, the gravitational forces that caused the initial earthquakes will break the planets. Literally, think of the ground beneath you cracking and crumbling.
"That's not the end of the planet yet, though, because the same thing would happen if the rogue rock skirted right by us. The real end comes when the planet comes into contact with our atmosphere. It'll only be a second or less, but the sheer speed of the planet along with its gravitational pull will disperse our atmosphere, and then," he clapped his hands together, "the planets collide. There'll be some ejecta, something you might see in an explosion, but otherwise, the intense heat from all the kinetic energy will melt both planets and," he interlaced his fingers, "they'll combine into one. Kind of like two people who wander around all their lives searching for each other, except they don't know it: it'll be sudden and intense, and it will be hot, goddamn it will be hot, but two will become one. Of course, all life on Earth will cease to exist, and we'll have a new planet in Earth's stead."
He took a drink from his glass and downed the last of it. The barman poured him more without asking.
"Didn' know all that, really. Not much of a science guy meself. You think the ones who left can ever come back?"
"If they survive and last for a few billion years while the neo-Earth cools and possibly becomes habitable, though it won't be the same planet. It might have a different orbit, it might have some new moons because of ejecta, so who knows. They'll have to find a new home somewhere, the lucky twats."
"Think they'll make it?"
"Better chance than we've got."
The barman sighed and downed the rest of his drink. He smacked his lips and wiped them.
"I don't know much 'bout science, like I said, but I know about drinks. Otherwise, I wouldn't be who I am, would I?"
"Of course," said the man with a small bow. His cheeks turned pink.
"I can tell you, with my very specific and narrowed knowledge, that the swill we are drinking isn't the best bottle I've got in the house. This, this," he said, holding up the glass and inspecting it, "this is aged for only twelve years. It's a damn baby. It's not go experience, it's got no years in it, it's got no, no..."
"Wisdom?"
The barman snapped his fingers and pointed at the man.
"Tha's right, sonny, no wisdom. I was savin' it for the last few days, but I lost track of when that was gonna be. When is that, by the by?"
The man pulled out his phone and checked the calendar.
"Thirteen days."
A bit of color drained from the barman's cheeks.
"Thirteen...thirteen...my, how time just comes up and kicks ya in the arse. I'll be right back." He trotted to a door adjacent to the large bottle store behind the bar and disappeared behind it. The man looked at the various filled bottles in their respective holders, each one's contents vibrating with the gentle rhythm of the Earth. He drank the last of his drink as the barman emerged from the door holding a simple dark bottle.
"This, my friend, this is real scotch whiskey. Brewed in Glasgow over three hundred years ago by me great-great-grandfather and handed down, specifically deigned for the day when our name became the premiere whiskey name in the world."
He chuckled and popped the cork off of it.
"Never happened, of course. Brewery was burned down by some fockers. Great-great-grandad never recovered from it, but the rest of the family kept the bottle in the hopes of some special occasion of the sort. Well, just as me great-great-grandad deigned this bottle for a special occasion, I deign this the special occasion for which," he poured some in the man's glass,"this bottle," he poured some in his own, "shall be used."
The man picked up the glass and smelled the contents. It was pungent and stunk of a river of urine. He raised it up and the barman met his glass.
"To the end," they both said, and downed the viscous liquid. The man gagged and coughed as the barman howled in surprise at the taste.
"Woo!" he shouted, looking at the bottle. "That, that," his face turned a tinge of purple, "that was terrible. Want some more?"
The man, still coughing, tapped his glass.
"Good man," said the barman, and he poured a bit more.
"It's not -cough-, it's not all bad though," said the man, recovering himself from his near asphyxiation.
"How so?" asked the barman, taking a sip and struggling to get it down.
"Well," said the man, shaking his head with the unnatural feeling of warmth. "When the two planets collide, all living things will be incinerated. Poof, everyone and everything is atoms and molecules. But!" he yelled with a bit of spit. "But, the neo-Earth will have a decent chance at reconstructing life."
"Why's that, eh?"
"Because we already existed!" said the man, a drunken smile creeping across his face. "Because we were here, our nice, complex genomes within those molecules will be spread around the new giant rock and have a good chance of creating new life on the new big blue ball that will hopefully emerge within a few billion years. So, really, should those fuckers who got lucky enough to leave all die off, there's still a chance some offshoot of humanity will still exist. That's why I made the video."
The barman raised an eyebrow.
"What video?"
The man shook his head.
"Don't worry about it, it's stupid. It won't survive the cataclysm."
The barman leaned on the bar with a curious grin.
"No, really, tell me."
The man leaned forward.
"Well, I made a video. Kind of a eulogy of the Earth and humanity. Summarizes human history, has accounts of language and species diversity, all that good stuff. It's on a flash drive inside a big iron ball that's reinforced with just about every plastic and metal that I could scrounge together. Thing is the size of a football and heavier than the hope I've got."
"You think it'll survive?"
The man shook his head.
"No, it'll incinerinerate like everything else. Even if it somehow defies the laws of physics and survives, the data on it won't last that long."
"So why do it?"
"To have something that acknowledges that I lived. To acknowledge that humanity existed. To highlight everything we did right and wrong, just to show that we weren't perfect, but we weren't evil. That we didn't destroy ourselves; probability did that for us."
The barman took a drink.
"Here's to you, my friend. Makes me feel like I'm doing shite keeping this pub runnin'."
The man shook his head.
"No, you're doing everything. You're being human and not stupid like the people who think that the power of prayer can divert a planet. You're telling me that my video wasn't wrong."
A sly grin found itself on the barman's face.
"So what's your name, sonny? I don't recall ever hearing it."
The man smiled and finished off his drink with the face of an imploding toddler.
"I am...I am...I am drunk."
He laughed an acknowledgement of idiotic stupor and simple enjoyment. The barman laughed as well.
"Jack," he said, extending his hand to the barman.
"Miles," said the barman, clasping Jack's hand in his hairy own.
"Well Miles, it's good to know you on the edge of infinity."
Miles poured both of them another glass.
"To...death?" said Miles.
"Death!"
Their glasses clinked together, the sound of sweet synchronicity, and they downed their drinks, laughing and smiling at the abyss on their doorstep.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Rules for Being a Tourist in Another Country
2. When buying anything, first buy something that no native in their right mind would buy, i.e. a mug with the queen's/president's/prime minister's/national animal's/great athlete's/television character's face on it. You want to stand out, after all.
3. As a corollary to purchasing, always argue with the cashier either in a choppy version of the native language or in a louder version of your own language. This still applies to American English vs. English English.
4. When walking anywhere, take steps no larger than that of the average toddler, and pay no attention to anyone walking in front of, behind, or to the sides of you. Remember, a tourist's job is to soak in the culture, and what better way to do that than to bump into natives and absorb them via osmosis?
5. If you are to take a picture of a great landmark, have a subject (friend, family member, stray orphan) stand at the one end of the walkway while you stand at the other end. This way, the natives will be forced to stop and wait while you take your picture, and you will get one completely unimpeded!
6. Walk everywhere with your rolling luggage. You know why.
7. Always compare everything to your native country. What's the point of going to another country if you can't openly boast about how much it stinks in comparison to your own?
8. After trying some local cuisine from a chain restaurant that also exists in your country, decide that you don't feel like eating anything aside from hotel food. The local food "makes your stomach ache."
9. Pay way too much for everything. Not because you necessarily want to, but because you can.
10. Don't actually indulge yourself in the finer points of the culture. It's all boring music, plays, and history anyway. The big buildings are what matters, and of course the ability to brag to your friends after the trip counts the most. "Oh yeah, we had a great time in London! We saw EVERYTHING."
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Friday, May 3, 2013
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Discretion denies what some may a call a remonstration of past follies. Memory has served its use through and throughout all of what we desire, but that which yearns for us peers around the corners of vexing temptation. A swift glance from the bursting dam means only that sparks won't spark.
Striking melodies clash with their counterparts as crescendos build deep within the chasms of the heart and cease, searching for the light in the darkness of it all. Granted the most within the time of flight cannot elicit the birdsong from the lips of man given that she is everywhere.
Tonic for the mind relays itself with vibrations throughout the body, ceasing when the hands are done striking the notes of the correct chords. Hatred of the fingers is not a common ailment but stares through the silence of unknown qualifications, destroying what should be and creating what is.
Me is a finite recursion of intellect and incredulous suppositions. I is the interpersonal scheming of the daily sunrise. We are naught but the assiduous machinations of others who contain naught but the assiduous machinations of others, ad nauseum. They are what we are because we are what they are.
In eyes do we feel the trickling of a stream of thoughts of others. Ears do not give us sight for food or dire straits, but instead the durable astuteness of thousands of recollections. For with a mouth can we become us or me or I or we or nothing, by which we create the juncture of malignancy and delight of wonder.
Wandering produces effects similar to joviality. Arriving tends to accrue mileage between the cracks of two branches of a tree through which light creeps around and tickles the shy boy sitting underneath. A field is a field until it decides it doesn't want to be a field, but the field cannot decide for itself because it is a field.
Red and blue and green are buzzes in the fingers of a deaf man and words in the eyes of the blind. Music like fire and velvet enraptures the unknown relaxation and causation of the universe, as it should be, for there is no known cure to the sight of a woman with her arms open to the wind.
Footprints in the dirt create shockwaves throughout the Earth and the Earth adjusts because it always has and always will, not because it desires to, but because that is what it does. Strings like light dance through the sun and project themselves in the hearth of the heart of the person who can see the happiness in others.
There is no me, nor an I, nor an us, nor a they, nor a we, because there never can nor ever will be. There is something that cannot be described or ascribed to a vision of an old man sitting among trees in the springtime air with no thought of anything else except the next second warmth.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Hullabaloo for a Speedbump
Let's assume, for a moment, that a country does decide to leave the Euro and revert back to its old currency. What would happen? Well, because that currency is not collectively backed by the other 16 members, the old currency would face severe inflation because of its speculated buying risk on the international market. The currency itself would fall in terms of exchange rate, and there would probably be austerity within the country, leading to higher unemployment, possibly the rise of nationalist parties, etc. There is little to no incentive to leave the Euro.
For a "smaller" country (always use that term lightly), the Euro and the Eurozone is a treasure trove. Not only is there equal footing for interstate trade within the Eurozone, but there is also a free transit for both people and companies. It also protects the smaller countries from highly unfavorable exchange rates in the international market.
But what about the current crisis, you ask? Won't the other Eurozone members want to boot the countries who are bringing the Euro down?
The answer, in simple terms, is no. The countries rated lower in international credit standards keep the Euro at a stable trading level, unlike the pound, which British Exchequer Osborne refuses to devalue (currently worth $1.53). Should the endangered countries leave the Euro, purchasing on the currency will likely rise, leading to an increase in its price, making exports of goods more difficult.
As for the legal side, crises such as these in a currency's infancy lead to a consolidation of the currency itself, such as in a set of new banking rules unveiled in December of 2012. Obviously, no currency is ever flawless: the dollar had more than its fair share of crises in its infancy, including individual states' desires to return to their own individual currencies.
I can only say it so many times: the European Union will not break up. Even if, on the strange and unlikely contingent that the Eurozone dissolves, the EU will remain. It is too deeply entrenched in the laws and trading regulations of its member states (especially in the original six) to suddenly dissolve, or even dissolve over time.
As one can always expect, recessions do not necessarily cure themselves in five years' time, or ten years' time, or even fifteen years' time. What matters, however, is wondering for whom is this a recession? Those who make from half a million (in whatever currency) to one million or more a year, or everyone below them?
That's all for now,
Das Flüg
Friday, April 19, 2013
Don't Drink the Blue Cup: Chapter 1
Saturday, April 6, 2013
Saddle Up, Lock and Load
One obvious answer is, of course, retaliate. Why shouldn't we retaliate, the hawks would say. It's a good question, but there is also a good answer. It isn't the North Korean people who threaten the world with annihilation, it is its untested and frightened leader. Kim Jong-Un stepped into the leadership position not a military man, but a son of a respected leader (in NK) who has a history of enjoying western culture.
When looking at North Korea, one must also look at the military: the military rules, above all else. North Korea has the largest standing army on Earth, mostly due to the fact that its government spouts anti-west and anti-South Korean propaganda. The top generals also wouldn't want a respected leader replaced by someone who has no prior military experience and who has, at least rhetorically, stated that peaceful negotiations are possible. What better way to perpetuate military dominance than to remove the man who threatens their purpose?
Thus, this is likely Jong-Un's proving ground: seeing how far he can push the rest of the world before the clock stops on his decision to push the button or not push the button. Of course, there is always a point of no return for this sort of thing, and it was nearly crossed in the Cuban Missile Crisis; for Jong-Un, that point may be when he recognizes that the NK military generals want to proceed with military action, and he doesn't want to. That would almost certainly lead to the beginning of hostilities, or a coup.
So, let's assume that Jong-Un does decide to strike a target, without being too specific about its location. What does the US do? The US has a military umbrella protecting South Korea and Japan, two of North Korea's assumed targets, leaving it responsible to come to the aid of either country in case of attack. Should it retaliate immediately, however?
In my opinion, no. Even if the US military strikes can be carried out only on government targets, the US should not attack. Why, you ask?
First, let me state that I am not ubiquitously anti-war; if a nation is attacked, obviously they have the right to retaliate, but just because one has the right to retaliate, that does not mean that it should be the first option. Consider the military strength of the US: it is the most technologically advanced military in the world with the highest number of nuclear weapons, fighter jets, etc. etc. etc. Razing a country like North Korea would only be problematic, especially with China right nearby (though that is another story).
The US should, instead, give North Korea, and specifically, Kim Jong-Un, options: First, give him the option of ceding power and dissolving the government (obviously won't happen); Second, give him the option of fleeing North Korea (problematic, but Kim is facing a lot of backlash from the established military leaders, though it still likely won't happen); Third, in conjunction with both China and South Korea, open the borders and allow NK citizens to become refugees (definitely won't happen); Fourth, disarm completely, dissolve the government, place the military under South Korean command, and surrender to a coalition force (definitely won't happen); Fifth, give him the option of disarming and opening the economy AND government.
President Obama has avoided making any aggressive remarks against North Korea, and for that, he is smart. He knows the situation of the country all too well, and is much less likely to engage in any kind of strike, preemptive or otherwise, than his predecessor was. I'm hoping that he can carry this rumination with him should there be some sort of outbreak; otherwise, several million people may die in the process.
Any war instigated by NK would have to be an absolute war, i.e. an all-or-nothing game. Giving Kim the option of an escape from (basically guaranteed) annihilation will likely work, but of course, that doesn't say anything about his generals.
The situation, in itself, is complex, with so many different angles (I avoided talking about China completely, though it fulfills the strange love triangle between them, NK, and the US; the issue of famine in North Korea is also salient, along with the younger population, many of whom are less likely to believe the government propaganda, etc.) that it's hard to see viable options. I'm just hoping that the first option isn't the last one for the people of North Korea.
That's all for now,
Das Flüg